Best Known (132−105, 132, s)-Nets in Base 9
(132−105, 132, 78)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (27, 132, 78)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 132, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
(132−105, 132, 110)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (27, 132, 110)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (26, 132, 110)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 109)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 110, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 109)-sequence over F9, using
(132−105, 132, 609)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (27, 132, 610)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (27, 131, 610)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 107093 951853 244926 184707 128740 024127 270252 298733 698767 029435 971052 528300 272845 631936 002609 529723 310650 220073 252057 168655 727041 > 9131 [i]