Best Known (144−105, 144, s)-Nets in Base 9
(144−105, 144, 81)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (39, 144, 81)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (32, 144, 81)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by Bezerra and GarcÃa over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 32 and N(F) ≥ 81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (32, 80)-sequence over F9, using
(144−105, 144, 140)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (39, 144, 140)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 139)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 140, using
(144−105, 144, 1032)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (39, 144, 1033)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (39, 143, 1033)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 29534 103761 828726 708517 737674 514198 103582 576440 486645 510635 759409 901725 806873 177231 764814 162318 822556 623286 266932 811231 066285 193361 411105 > 9143 [i]