Best Known (26, 26+105, s)-Nets in Base 9
(26, 26+105, 78)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (26, 131, 78)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 131, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
(26, 26+105, 110)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (26, 131, 110)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 109)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 110, using
(26, 26+105, 582)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (26, 131, 583)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (26, 130, 583)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 11429 279232 238442 219494 084250 775608 989514 430067 423140 515338 471026 043419 510772 735824 162518 202380 818277 129838 419128 865695 778145 > 9130 [i]