Best Known (29, 29+105, s)-Nets in Base 9
(29, 29+105, 78)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (29, 134, 78)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 134, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
(29, 29+105, 110)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (29, 134, 110)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (26, 134, 110)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 109)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 110, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 109)-sequence over F9, using
(29, 29+105, 665)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (29, 134, 666)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (29, 133, 666)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 8 334599 507914 261714 873810 494453 104266 992013 056421 090347 200752 501506 054056 116498 466826 663198 899321 788663 034367 486259 943774 531265 > 9133 [i]