Best Known (135−107, 135, s)-Nets in Base 9
(135−107, 135, 78)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (28, 135, 78)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 135, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
(135−107, 135, 110)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (28, 135, 110)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (26, 135, 110)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 109)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 110, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 109)-sequence over F9, using
(135−107, 135, 633)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (28, 135, 634)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (28, 134, 634)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 76 341897 912357 884843 403003 763785 590161 268389 211179 240623 125328 972921 853623 901268 644196 502154 502304 869146 559910 591623 322588 645777 > 9134 [i]