Best Known (28, 28+109, s)-Nets in Base 9
(28, 28+109, 78)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (28, 137, 78)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 137, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
(28, 28+109, 110)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (28, 137, 110)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (26, 137, 110)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 109)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 110, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 109)-sequence over F9, using
(28, 28+109, 630)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (28, 137, 631)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (28, 136, 631)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 6203 120509 465732 140730 236931 380296 541153 292285 852141 229207 896719 767728 549656 053138 059137 599695 343687 263713 823614 337256 474806 929361 > 9136 [i]