Best Known (136−110, 136, s)-Nets in Base 9
(136−110, 136, 78)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (26, 136, 78)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 136, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
(136−110, 136, 110)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (26, 136, 110)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 109)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 110, using
(136−110, 136, 577)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (26, 136, 578)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 6483 158813 150230 034199 967771 133206 899386 137525 689109 915634 746865 920615 928313 464676 869389 765140 367051 800821 717646 724859 210382 215985 > 9136 [i]