Best Known (24, 24+111, s)-Nets in Base 9
(24, 24+111, 78)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (24, 135, 78)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 135, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
(24, 24+111, 92)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (24, 135, 92)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (23, 135, 92)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 91)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 23 and N(F) ≥ 92, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 91)-sequence over F9, using
(24, 24+111, 530)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (24, 135, 531)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (24, 134, 531)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 79 273180 609686 555241 902389 928657 438333 844710 699141 630276 763440 390032 449616 194726 442458 343690 792140 387015 760013 296716 597463 954985 > 9134 [i]