Best Known (23, 23+117, s)-Nets in Base 9
(23, 23+117, 78)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (23, 140, 78)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 140, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
(23, 23+117, 92)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (23, 140, 92)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 91)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 23 and N(F) ≥ 92, using
(23, 23+117, 508)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (23, 140, 509)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (23, 139, 509)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 4 749029 239307 218730 959990 806335 080120 937368 353148 755640 321528 801105 498612 903198 798588 290049 627327 838993 175621 801046 589924 125100 548689 > 9139 [i]