Best Known (29, 29+119, s)-Nets in Base 9
(29, 29+119, 78)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (29, 148, 78)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 148, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
(29, 29+119, 110)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (29, 148, 110)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (26, 148, 110)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 109)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 110, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 109)-sequence over F9, using
(29, 29+119, 644)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (29, 148, 645)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (29, 147, 645)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 194 628258 728344 627186 473736 461787 400092 676105 236249 238452 319960 504478 821895 392253 668503 886528 635656 917515 064799 243669 513013 089507 546847 720313 > 9147 [i]