Best Known (24, 24+121, s)-Nets in Base 9
(24, 24+121, 78)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (24, 145, 78)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 145, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
(24, 24+121, 92)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (24, 145, 92)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (23, 145, 92)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 91)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 23 and N(F) ≥ 92, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 91)-sequence over F9, using
(24, 24+121, 529)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (24, 145, 530)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (24, 144, 530)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 280953 813776 042981 300884 135762 721537 158121 484150 024778 961242 538276 978901 679772 728301 206716 444068 855955 549884 932766 163529 284938 618526 434625 > 9144 [i]