Best Known (20, 20+13, s)-Nets in Base 9
(20, 20+13, 232)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (20, 33, 232)-net over F9, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (20, 36, 232)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 18, 116)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 116, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 18, 116)-net over F81, using
(20, 20+13, 361)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (20, 33, 361)-net over F9, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(933, 361, F9, 13) (dual of [361, 328, 14]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(933, 364, F9, 13) (dual of [364, 331, 14]-code), using
(20, 20+13, 45961)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (20, 33, 45962)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (20, 32, 45962)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 3 433880 522451 869501 345158 592545 > 932 [i]