Best Known (29, 29+13, s)-Nets in Base 9
(29, 29+13, 400)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (29, 42, 400)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (8, 14, 200)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 7, 100)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 99)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 100, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 99)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 7, 100)-net over F81, using
- digital (15, 28, 200)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 14, 100)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 99)-sequence over F81 (see above)
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 14, 100)-net over F81, using
- digital (8, 14, 200)-net over F9, using
(29, 29+13, 1452)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (29, 42, 1452)-net over F9, using
(29, 29+13, 1241046)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (29, 42, 1241047)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (29, 41, 1241047)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 1330 281721 824728 383270 408768 299682 757457 > 941 [i]