Best Known (31, 31+13, s)-Nets in Base 9
(31, 31+13, 432)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (31, 44, 432)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (8, 14, 200)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 7, 100)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 99)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 100, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 99)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 7, 100)-net over F81, using
- digital (17, 30, 232)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 15, 116)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 116, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 15, 116)-net over F81, using
- digital (8, 14, 200)-net over F9, using
(31, 31+13, 2091)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (31, 44, 2091)-net over F9, using
(31, 31+13, 2581484)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (31, 44, 2581485)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (31, 43, 2581485)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 107752 744681 670770 781490 337271 155394 745777 > 943 [i]