Best Known (63−15, 63, s)-Nets in Base 9
(63−15, 63, 1876)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (48, 63, 1876)-net over F9, using
- 93 times duplication [i] based on digital (45, 60, 1876)-net over F9, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(960, 1876, F9, 15, 15) (dual of [(1876, 15), 28080, 16]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 7-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(960, 13133, F9, 15) (dual of [13133, 13073, 16]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(960, 13134, F9, 15) (dual of [13134, 13074, 16]-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(8130, 6567, F81, 15) (dual of [6567, 6537, 16]-code), using
- construction X applied to C([0,7]) ⊂ C([0,6]) [i] based on
- linear OA(8129, 6562, F81, 15) (dual of [6562, 6533, 16]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 6562 | 814−1, defining interval I = [0,7], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−7,−6,…,7}|+1 = 16 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(8125, 6562, F81, 13) (dual of [6562, 6537, 14]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 6562 | 814−1, defining interval I = [0,6], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−6,−5,…,6}|+1 = 14 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(811, 5, F81, 1) (dual of [5, 4, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(811, s, F81, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to C([0,7]) ⊂ C([0,6]) [i] based on
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(8130, 6567, F81, 15) (dual of [6567, 6537, 16]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(960, 13134, F9, 15) (dual of [13134, 13074, 16]-code), using
- OOA 7-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(960, 13133, F9, 15) (dual of [13133, 13073, 16]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(960, 1876, F9, 15, 15) (dual of [(1876, 15), 28080, 16]-NRT-code), using
(63−15, 63, 14882)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (48, 63, 14882)-net over F9, using
(63−15, 63, large)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (48, 63, large)-net in base 9, because
- 13 times m-reduction [i] would yield (48, 50, large)-net in base 9, but