Best Known (52−16, 52, s)-Nets in Base 9
(52−16, 52, 400)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (36, 52, 400)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (10, 18, 200)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 9, 100)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 99)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 100, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 99)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 9, 100)-net over F81, using
- digital (18, 34, 200)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 17, 100)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 99)-sequence over F81 (see above)
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 17, 100)-net over F81, using
- digital (10, 18, 200)-net over F9, using
(52−16, 52, 1639)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (36, 52, 1639)-net over F9, using
(52−16, 52, 750194)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (36, 52, 750195)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 41 745871 826967 510105 184547 336962 609645 729000 128193 > 952 [i]