Best Known (23, 23+17, s)-Nets in Base 9
(23, 23+17, 232)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (23, 40, 232)-net over F9, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (23, 42, 232)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 21, 116)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 116, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 21, 116)-net over F81, using
(23, 23+17, 272)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (23, 40, 272)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 20, 136)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 135)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 136, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 135)-sequence over F81, using
(23, 23+17, 21107)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (23, 40, 21108)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (23, 39, 21108)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 16 425425 243689 893370 484007 386162 825985 > 939 [i]