Best Known (43, 43+18, s)-Nets in Base 9
(43, 43+18, 432)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (43, 61, 432)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (43, 62, 432)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (11, 20, 200)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 10, 100)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 99)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 100, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 99)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 10, 100)-net over F81, using
- digital (23, 42, 232)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 21, 116)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 116, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 21, 116)-net over F81, using
- digital (11, 20, 200)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(43, 43+18, 2390)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (43, 61, 2390)-net over F9, using
(43, 43+18, 1521611)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (43, 61, 1521612)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 16173 176885 057480 104552 847175 640177 721117 088243 536419 262305 > 961 [i]