Best Known (59−19, 59, s)-Nets in Base 9
(59−19, 59, 364)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (40, 59, 364)-net over F9, using
- 91 times duplication [i] based on digital (39, 58, 364)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (9, 18, 164)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 9, 82)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 81)-sequence over F81, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 82, using
- the rational function field F81(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 81)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 9, 82)-net over F81, using
- digital (21, 40, 200)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 20, 100)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 99)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 100, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 99)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 20, 100)-net over F81, using
- digital (9, 18, 164)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(59−19, 59, 1276)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (40, 59, 1276)-net over F9, using
(59−19, 59, 731511)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (40, 59, 731512)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (40, 58, 731512)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 22 185403 284783 665890 733083 608681 340477 742980 780359 280065 > 958 [i]