Best Known (64−19, 64, s)-Nets in Base 9
(64−19, 64, 464)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (45, 64, 464)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (13, 22, 232)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 11, 116)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 116, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 11, 116)-net over F81, using
- digital (23, 42, 232)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 21, 116)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81 (see above)
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 21, 116)-net over F81, using
- digital (13, 22, 232)-net over F9, using
(64−19, 64, 2342)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (45, 64, 2342)-net over F9, using
(64−19, 64, 2479465)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (45, 64, 2479466)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (45, 63, 2479466)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 1 310021 264516 006503 694215 565902 202419 890752 972913 012081 747153 > 963 [i]