Best Known (36, 36+19, s)-Nets in Base 9
(36, 36+19, 344)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (36, 55, 344)-net over F9, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (36, 58, 344)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 29, 172)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 171)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 172, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 171)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 29, 172)-net over F81, using
(36, 36+19, 816)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (36, 55, 816)-net over F9, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(955, 816, F9, 19) (dual of [816, 761, 20]-code), using
- 80 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (3, 0, 0, 1, 7 times 0, 1, 20 times 0, 1, 47 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(949, 730, F9, 19) (dual of [730, 681, 20]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 730 | 96−1, defining interval I = [0,9], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−9,−8,…,9}|+1 = 20 (BCH-bound) [i]
- 80 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (3, 0, 0, 1, 7 times 0, 1, 20 times 0, 1, 47 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(949, 730, F9, 19) (dual of [730, 681, 20]-code), using
(36, 36+19, 275491)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (36, 55, 275492)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (36, 54, 275492)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 3381 430682 844922 479635 706808 550874 702634 091975 988257 > 954 [i]