Best Known (55−20, 55, s)-Nets in Base 9
(55−20, 55, 344)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (35, 55, 344)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (35, 56, 344)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 28, 172)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 171)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 172, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 171)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 28, 172)-net over F81, using
(55−20, 55, 679)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (35, 55, 679)-net over F9, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(955, 679, F9, 20) (dual of [679, 624, 21]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(955, 728, F9, 20) (dual of [728, 673, 21]-code), using
(55−20, 55, 100275)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (35, 55, 100276)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 30433 778401 786586 568277 662561 874947 447793 523896 698561 > 955 [i]