Best Known (18, 18+21, s)-Nets in Base 9
(18, 18+21, 74)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (18, 39, 74)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (17, 39, 74)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 73)-sequence over F9, using
(18, 18+21, 75)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (18, 39, 75)-net over F9, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(939, 75, F9, 2, 21) (dual of [(75, 2), 111, 22]-NRT-code), using
- 1 times NRT-code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OOA(937, 74, F9, 2, 21) (dual of [(74, 2), 111, 22]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(2;F,126P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 74, using
- 1 times NRT-code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OOA(937, 74, F9, 2, 21) (dual of [(74, 2), 111, 22]-NRT-code), using
(18, 18+21, 2387)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (18, 39, 2388)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (18, 38, 2388)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 1 827750 174840 228049 733530 615939 271873 > 938 [i]