Best Known (30, 30+21, s)-Nets in Base 9
(30, 30+21, 300)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (30, 51, 300)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (30, 52, 300)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 26, 150)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 149)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 150, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 149)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 26, 150)-net over F81, using
(30, 30+21, 312)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (30, 51, 312)-net over F9, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(951, 312, F9, 21) (dual of [312, 261, 22]-code), using
- 3 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (1, 0, 0) [i] based on linear OA(950, 308, F9, 21) (dual of [308, 258, 22]-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(8125, 154, F81, 21) (dual of [154, 129, 22]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,132P) [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 154, using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(8125, 154, F81, 21) (dual of [154, 129, 22]-code), using
- 3 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (1, 0, 0) [i] based on linear OA(950, 308, F9, 21) (dual of [308, 258, 22]-code), using
(30, 30+21, 33421)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (30, 51, 33422)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (30, 50, 33422)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 515475 764503 408892 643242 135307 923481 761218 279841 > 950 [i]