Best Known (34, 34+21, s)-Nets in Base 9
(34, 34+21, 320)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (34, 55, 320)-net over F9, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (34, 58, 320)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 29, 160)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 159)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 160, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 159)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 29, 160)-net over F81, using
(34, 34+21, 501)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (34, 55, 501)-net over F9, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(955, 501, F9, 21) (dual of [501, 446, 22]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(955, 728, F9, 21) (dual of [728, 673, 22]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 728 = 93−1, defining interval I = [0,20], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 22 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(955, 728, F9, 21) (dual of [728, 673, 22]-code), using
(34, 34+21, 80494)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (34, 55, 80495)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (34, 54, 80495)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 3381 707928 734121 913152 275340 585187 097845 463509 183665 > 954 [i]