Best Known (30, 30+23, s)-Nets in Base 9
(30, 30+23, 232)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (30, 53, 232)-net over F9, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (30, 56, 232)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 28, 116)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 116, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 28, 116)-net over F81, using
(30, 30+23, 272)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (30, 53, 272)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (30, 54, 272)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 27, 136)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 135)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 136, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 135)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 27, 136)-net over F81, using
(30, 30+23, 19895)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (30, 53, 19896)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (30, 52, 19896)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 41 762639 536403 363304 230114 970112 732001 166600 065089 > 952 [i]