Best Known (48, 48+23, s)-Nets in Base 9
(48, 48+23, 364)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (48, 71, 364)-net over F9, using
- 91 times duplication [i] based on digital (47, 70, 364)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (11, 22, 164)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 11, 82)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 81)-sequence over F81, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 82, using
- the rational function field F81(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 81)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 11, 82)-net over F81, using
- digital (25, 48, 200)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 24, 100)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 99)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 100, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 99)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 24, 100)-net over F81, using
- digital (11, 22, 164)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(48, 48+23, 1370)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (48, 71, 1370)-net over F9, using
(48, 48+23, 725057)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (48, 71, 725058)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (48, 70, 725058)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 6 265797 831918 707176 653361 594584 916607 982507 421358 113449 097349 570545 > 970 [i]