Best Known (55−25, 55, s)-Nets in Base 9
(55−25, 55, 232)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (30, 55, 232)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (30, 56, 232)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 28, 116)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 116, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 28, 116)-net over F81, using
(55−25, 55, 236)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (30, 55, 236)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (30, 56, 236)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 28, 118)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 117)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 118, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 117)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 28, 118)-net over F81, using
(55−25, 55, 13005)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (30, 55, 13006)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (30, 54, 13006)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 3382 762973 649194 013491 979879 281203 074946 700978 323905 > 954 [i]