Best Known (59−25, 59, s)-Nets in Base 9
(59−25, 59, 300)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (34, 59, 300)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (34, 60, 300)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 30, 150)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 149)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 150, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 149)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 30, 150)-net over F81, using
(59−25, 59, 308)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (34, 59, 308)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (34, 60, 308)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 30, 154)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 153)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 154, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 153)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 30, 154)-net over F81, using
(59−25, 59, 27060)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (34, 59, 27061)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (34, 58, 27061)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 22 193039 450918 795529 710407 887373 331317 834804 615042 025313 > 958 [i]