Best Known (23, 23+25, s)-Nets in Base 9
(23, 23+25, 78)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (23, 48, 78)-net over F9, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 48, 78)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- F3 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F9 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F9, using
(23, 23+25, 82)-Net in Base 9 — Constructive
(23, 48, 82)-net in base 9, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 32, 82)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 81)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 82, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 81)-sequence over F27, using
(23, 23+25, 96)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (23, 48, 96)-net over F9, using
(23, 23+25, 3604)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (23, 48, 3605)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (23, 47, 3605)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 707 472716 748656 595167 747025 629516 010029 347681 > 947 [i]