Best Known (29, 29+25, s)-Nets in Base 9
(29, 29+25, 232)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (29, 54, 232)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 27, 116)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 116, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
(29, 29+25, 236)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (29, 54, 236)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 27, 118)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 117)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 118, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 117)-sequence over F81, using
(29, 29+25, 10828)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (29, 54, 10829)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (29, 53, 10829)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 375 984689 124791 210327 119101 859922 025151 884312 785505 > 953 [i]