MinT - Best Known (72, 72+26, s)-Nets in Base 9

Best Known (72, 72+26, s)-Nets in Base 9

(72, 72+26, 756)-Net over F₉ — Constructive and digital

Digital (72, 98, 756)-net over F₉, using

(u,Â u+v)-construction [i] based on
1. digital (1, 14, 16)-net over F₉, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 15)-sequence over F₉, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₉ with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 16, using
      - a function field by GarcÃa and Quoos [i]
2. digital (58, 84, 740)-net over F₉, using
  - trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 42, 370)-net over F₈₁, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F₈₁, using
      - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₈₁ with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
        a function field by GarcÃa and Quoos [i]

(72, 72+26, 7013)-Net over F₉ — Digital

Digital (72, 98, 7013)-net over F₉, using

Gilbertâ€“VarÅ¡amov bound [i]

(72, 72+26, large)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s

There is no (72, 98, large)-net in base 9, because

24 times m-reduction [i] would yield (72, 74, large)-net in base 9, but
- mutually orthogonal hypercube bound [i]