Best Known (63−28, 63, s)-Nets in Base 9
(63−28, 63, 232)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (35, 63, 232)-net over F9, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (35, 66, 232)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 33, 116)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 116, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 33, 116)-net over F81, using
(63−28, 63, 272)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (35, 63, 272)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (35, 64, 272)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 32, 136)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 135)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 136, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 135)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 32, 136)-net over F81, using
(63−28, 63, 14866)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (35, 63, 14867)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 1 310239 592607 583875 909020 035747 693774 838210 714991 027313 732305 > 963 [i]