Best Known (79, 79+29, s)-Nets in Base 9
(79, 79+29, 770)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (79, 108, 770)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (4, 18, 30)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 29)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 30, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 29)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (61, 90, 740)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 45, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 45, 370)-net over F81, using
- digital (4, 18, 30)-net over F9, using
(79, 79+29, 6784)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (79, 108, 6784)-net over F9, using
(79, 79+29, large)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (79, 108, large)-net in base 9, because
- 27 times m-reduction [i] would yield (79, 81, large)-net in base 9, but