Best Known (127−31, 127, s)-Nets in Base 9
(127−31, 127, 940)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (96, 127, 940)-net over F9, using
- 91 times duplication [i] based on digital (95, 126, 940)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (17, 32, 200)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 16, 100)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 99)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 100, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 99)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 16, 100)-net over F81, using
- digital (63, 94, 740)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 47, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 47, 370)-net over F81, using
- digital (17, 32, 200)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(127−31, 127, 16509)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (96, 127, 16509)-net over F9, using
(127−31, 127, large)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (96, 127, large)-net in base 9, because
- 29 times m-reduction [i] would yield (96, 98, large)-net in base 9, but