Best Known (66−31, 66, s)-Nets in Base 9
(66−31, 66, 232)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (35, 66, 232)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 33, 116)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 116, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
(66−31, 66, 236)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (35, 66, 236)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 33, 118)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 117)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 118, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 117)-sequence over F81, using
(66−31, 66, 10949)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (35, 66, 10950)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (35, 65, 10950)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 106 252335 783530 682269 412645 744613 460608 400002 055802 400813 702161 > 965 [i]