Best Known (40, 40+31, s)-Nets in Base 9
(40, 40+31, 300)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (40, 71, 300)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (40, 72, 300)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 36, 150)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 149)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 150, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 149)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 36, 150)-net over F81, using
(40, 40+31, 308)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (40, 71, 308)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (40, 72, 308)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 36, 154)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 153)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 154, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 153)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 36, 154)-net over F81, using
(40, 40+31, 22784)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (40, 71, 22785)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (40, 70, 22785)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 6 267903 856685 652220 496404 156660 324694 264104 784547 067463 628758 683833 > 970 [i]