Best Known (99, 99+31, s)-Nets in Base 9
(99, 99+31, 972)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (99, 130, 972)-net over F9, using
- 92 times duplication [i] based on digital (97, 128, 972)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (19, 34, 232)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 17, 116)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 116, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 17, 116)-net over F81, using
- digital (63, 94, 740)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 47, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 47, 370)-net over F81, using
- digital (19, 34, 232)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(99, 99+31, 20562)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (99, 130, 20562)-net over F9, using
(99, 99+31, large)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (99, 130, large)-net in base 9, because
- 29 times m-reduction [i] would yield (99, 101, large)-net in base 9, but