Best Known (63−32, 63, s)-Nets in Base 9
(63−32, 63, 84)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (31, 63, 84)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (2, 18, 20)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 19)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 20, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 19)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (13, 45, 64)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 63)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (2, 18, 20)-net over F9, using
(63−32, 63, 94)-Net in Base 9 — Constructive
(31, 63, 94)-net in base 9, using
- base change [i] based on digital (10, 42, 94)-net over F27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 93)-sequence over F27, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F27 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 94, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 93)-sequence over F27, using
(63−32, 63, 129)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (31, 63, 129)-net over F9, using
(63−32, 63, 4852)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (31, 63, 4853)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 1 313911 008575 689822 095802 675517 619833 944272 087994 391218 523265 > 963 [i]