Best Known (129−33, 129, s)-Nets in Base 9
(129−33, 129, 822)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (96, 129, 822)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (15, 31, 82)-net over F9, using
- base reduction for projective spaces (embedding PG(15,81) in PG(30,9)) for nets [i] based on digital (0, 16, 82)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 81)-sequence over F81, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 82, using
- the rational function field F81(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 81)-sequence over F81, using
- base reduction for projective spaces (embedding PG(15,81) in PG(30,9)) for nets [i] based on digital (0, 16, 82)-net over F81, using
- digital (65, 98, 740)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 49, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 49, 370)-net over F81, using
- digital (15, 31, 82)-net over F9, using
(129−33, 129, 11251)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (96, 129, 11251)-net over F9, using
(129−33, 129, large)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (96, 129, large)-net in base 9, because
- 31 times m-reduction [i] would yield (96, 98, large)-net in base 9, but