Best Known (73−33, 73, s)-Nets in Base 9
(73−33, 73, 232)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (40, 73, 232)-net over F9, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (40, 76, 232)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 38, 116)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 116, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 38, 116)-net over F81, using
(73−33, 73, 272)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (40, 73, 272)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (40, 74, 272)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 37, 136)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 135)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 136, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 135)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 37, 136)-net over F81, using
(73−33, 73, 16722)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (40, 73, 16723)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (40, 72, 16723)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 507 917123 504760 094257 165310 634158 275068 973360 404655 716539 769157 463425 > 972 [i]