Best Known (38, 38+33, s)-Nets in Base 9
(38, 38+33, 232)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (38, 71, 232)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (38, 72, 232)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 36, 116)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 116, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 36, 116)-net over F81, using
(38, 38+33, 236)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (38, 71, 236)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (38, 72, 236)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 36, 118)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 117)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 118, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 117)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 36, 118)-net over F81, using
(38, 38+33, 12703)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (38, 71, 12704)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (38, 70, 12704)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 6 267019 618516 675446 001959 008159 960180 979856 099884 448900 954578 169857 > 970 [i]