Best Known (82, 82+33, s)-Nets in Base 9
(82, 82+33, 756)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (82, 115, 756)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 17, 16)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 15)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 15)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (65, 98, 740)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 49, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 49, 370)-net over F81, using
- digital (1, 17, 16)-net over F9, using
(82, 82+33, 4312)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (82, 115, 4312)-net over F9, using
(82, 82+33, 5350887)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (82, 115, 5350888)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (82, 114, 5350888)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 6 076399 338058 008033 700815 838036 920516 145931 872727 317873 924766 960506 617796 841349 504185 820443 635247 645271 378945 > 9114 [i]