Best Known (137−34, 137, s)-Nets in Base 9
(137−34, 137, 940)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (103, 137, 940)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (103, 138, 940)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (19, 36, 200)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 18, 100)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 99)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 100, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 99)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 18, 100)-net over F81, using
- digital (67, 102, 740)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 51, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 51, 370)-net over F81, using
- digital (19, 36, 200)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(137−34, 137, 15076)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (103, 137, 15076)-net over F9, using
(137−34, 137, large)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (103, 137, large)-net in base 9, because
- 32 times m-reduction [i] would yield (103, 105, large)-net in base 9, but