Best Known (128−35, 128, s)-Nets in Base 9
(128−35, 128, 780)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (93, 128, 780)-net over F9, using
- 91 times duplication [i] based on digital (92, 127, 780)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (8, 25, 40)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 39)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 8 and N(F) ≥ 40, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 39)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (67, 102, 740)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 51, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 51, 370)-net over F81, using
- digital (8, 25, 40)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(128−35, 128, 6636)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (93, 128, 6636)-net over F9, using
(128−35, 128, large)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (93, 128, large)-net in base 9, because
- 33 times m-reduction [i] would yield (93, 95, large)-net in base 9, but