MinT - Best Known (64−35, 64, s)-Nets in Base 9

Best Known (64−35, 64, s)-Nets in Base 9

(64−35, 64, 78)-Net over F₉ — Constructive and digital

Digital (29, 64, 78)-net over F₉, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (22, 64, 78)-net over F₉, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (22, 77)-sequence over F₉, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₉ with g(F) = 22 and N(F) ≥ 78, using
    - F₃ from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F₉ [i]

(64−35, 64, 82)-Net in Base 9 — Constructive

(29, 64, 82)-net in base 9, using

2 times m-reduction [i] based on (29, 66, 82)-net in base 9, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 44, 82)-net over F₂₇, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 81)-sequence over F₂₇, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₂₇ with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 82, using
      - a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]

(64−35, 64, 110)-Net over F₉ — Digital

Digital (29, 64, 110)-net over F₉, using

t-expansion [i] based on digital (26, 64, 110)-net over F₉, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (26, 109)-sequence over F₉, using
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₉ with g(F) = 26 and N(F) ≥ 110, using
    - a curve from the manYPoints database [i]

(64−35, 64, 3074)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s

There is no (29, 64, 3075)-net in base 9, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (29, 63, 3075)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9^mÂ â‰¥ 1 315449 426090 836714 603487 058910 745610 030040 346664 669237 579161 > 9⁶³ [i]