Best Known (81−35, 81, s)-Nets in Base 9
(81−35, 81, 320)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (46, 81, 320)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (46, 82, 320)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 41, 160)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 159)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 160, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 159)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 41, 160)-net over F81, using
(81−35, 81, 334)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (46, 81, 334)-net over F9, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (46, 82, 334)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 41, 167)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 166)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 167, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 166)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 41, 167)-net over F81, using
(81−35, 81, 27749)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (46, 81, 27750)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (46, 80, 27750)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 21858 736790 089614 494138 162517 918583 384502 798739 644668 651488 066590 856777 777201 > 980 [i]