MinT - Best Known (106, 106+35, s)-Nets in Base 9

Best Known (106, 106+35, s)-Nets in Base 9

(106, 106+35, 972)-Net over F₉ — Constructive and digital

Digital (106, 141, 972)-net over F₉, using

9¹ times duplication [i] based on digital (105, 140, 972)-net over F₉, using
- (u,Â u+v)-construction [i] based on
  1. digital (21, 38, 232)-net over F₉, using
    - trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 19, 116)-net over F₈₁, using
      - net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 115)-sequence over F₈₁, using
        Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₈₁ with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 116, using
        a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]
  2. digital (67, 102, 740)-net over F₉, using
    - trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 51, 370)-net over F₈₁, using
      - net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F₈₁, using
        Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₈₁ with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
        a function field by GarcÃa and Quoos [i]

(106, 106+35, 15352)-Net over F₉ — Digital

Digital (106, 141, 15352)-net over F₉, using

Gilbertâ€“VarÅ¡amov bound [i]

(106, 106+35, large)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s

There is no (106, 141, large)-net in base 9, because

33 times m-reduction [i] would yield (106, 108, large)-net in base 9, but
- mutually orthogonal hypercube bound [i]