Best Known (47, 47+35, s)-Nets in Base 9
(47, 47+35, 320)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (47, 82, 320)-net over F9, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (47, 84, 320)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 42, 160)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 159)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 160, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 159)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (5, 42, 160)-net over F81, using
(47, 47+35, 380)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (47, 82, 380)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 41, 190)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 189)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 190, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 189)-sequence over F81, using
(47, 47+35, 31579)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (47, 82, 31580)-net in base 9, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (47, 81, 31580)-net in base 9, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 196713 374253 060189 400192 765486 191833 856639 425981 621957 262294 312328 343238 227169 > 981 [i]