Best Known (126−36, 126, s)-Nets in Base 9
(126−36, 126, 770)-Net over F9 — Constructive and digital
Digital (90, 126, 770)-net over F9, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (4, 22, 30)-net over F9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 29)-sequence over F9, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 30, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 29)-sequence over F9, using
- digital (68, 104, 740)-net over F9, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 52, 370)-net over F81, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F81 with g(F) = 16 and N(F) ≥ 370, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (16, 369)-sequence over F81, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (16, 52, 370)-net over F81, using
- digital (4, 22, 30)-net over F9, using
(126−36, 126, 4754)-Net over F9 — Digital
Digital (90, 126, 4754)-net over F9, using
(126−36, 126, 4515819)-Net in Base 9 — Upper bound on s
There is no (90, 126, 4515820)-net in base 9, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 1 716155 209426 405532 942322 476185 269557 071432 846405 895079 391253 085893 458353 580891 452954 718596 671192 231413 907253 319936 940097 > 9126 [i]